Chalice Lighting
Robert
Buckman, Worship Associate
We
begin by honoring the Light.
We
light the Chalice for our families, our
beloved, our friends, for all our relations;
For
those who are near and for those from
whom we feel an unwanted distance;
For
the newborn, for the elderly, and for all
the orphaned and wounded children;
For
those who have suffered the loss of
loved ones.
May
the light from this Chalice inspire us to
heal, not to harm; to help, not to hinder;
to bless, not to condemn.
May
its radiance spread light into the darkened corners of our world and
soften the hearts of all war planners and all war makers.
May
its radiance pour out upon our hearts and bring peace to all souls.
Call
to Worship
We gather, agreeing to
seek together the most radical implications of what it means to be religious.
In its ancient meanings,
the word, “religion,” speaks of binding together, suggesting that by
taking the fragments of experience, by applying to them the reason of
the mind
and the aspirations of
the heart, we can bring out of those fragments a unity of meaning and
a focus of personal commitment.
We gather to share the
human adventure;
To bind together that which
is asunder in our lives;
To heal ourselves and offer
comfort to others;
To lift our sorrow;
To reaffirm the hopes of
the heart;
And renew promises of our
most worthy commitments.
--Todd J. Taylor, adapted
We join now in worship.
Meditation and Prayer
Patricia Cornwell, author
of an Op-Ed page piece in a recent New York Times, reflected
on how the sniper shootings are poisoning our everyday lives.
We don’t
want to buy gas. We don’t want our children going to school. We don’t
want to shop. We don’t want to drive to work. We may deliberate for
hours whether to go to the grocery car or pharmacy. …etc., etc. … Our
reaction to the Washington sniper is normal and understandable, and
I have yielded to it myself from time to time. … But I have come to
a conclusion about our fear and what we must do about it, and in part,
this revelation entered my life just the other day.
In July, Ms. Cornwell goes
on, there was a serial killer in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. She spoke to
the mother of a woman who was murdered by the serial killer:
I asked her what she could tell the rest
of us. We live in a world of terrorist cells, of serial killers, of
spree snipers, and as hard as we try, we can’t seem to catch them. What
can we do?
“Get involved,” she answered. “People should
notice a strange car or a truck or a person in their neighborhood. People
need to be neighbors again and care for each other. You can’t hole up
in a house and not get dressed and not go out.”
And if she lived in the
Washington area right now?
“The
way my adrenaline’s pumping, [she replied] I’d go out in my car [now]
looking for him.”
Some dark days, tremors
sweep across our lives. Troubling events accost us. We have grown accustomed
to reading about such things, and often we have fenced off our natural
sympathies with this thought: this belongs to someone else.
But, since September 11
last year, we’re not at all confident that bad things happen to someone
else anymore. The world of conflict and violence is at our doorstep.
Crisis brushes close to
us, touches us, and touches us again, and yet again. We are frustrated
by knowing too much, and not knowing what’s really going on. We are
smothered by incessant reporting. Our bodies fill up with knots of anxiety.
Our throats are dry. We would weep, but our eyes have no tears. We could
cry out, but fear holds us still. Who has done this to us?
In reflecting upon the
dispiriting time in which we live, I have come to believe that the basic
religious response is to refuse to be dispirited for too long.
May we seek and find grounding
wherever it may be found: in beauty, in charity, in love.
May we trust in the spirit
that will not be quelled forever, that rises up in people from some
mysterious source; energy that comes again to affirm that we are a part
of something truly wonderful and worthwhile.
May we join hands in healing.
May we have the courage to act, and the faith that life is good.
Let us enter the extended
silence together…
[silence]
Amen.
Reading
The
revolutionary epoch known as the Amarna Age happened between 1353 and
1336BCE. At the peak of Egypt’s imperial glory, the pharaoh Akhenaten
assumed the throne of Egypt. For a brief but extraordinary period,
the art, the religion, and the politics of ancient Egypt were all transformed
by the vision of this one man who worshiped the light of the sun, the
god Aten.
The following poem is from
Ancient Egypt. In it, we hear a Genesis story that ascribes divinity
to the sun. The ancient Egyptians believed that the Pharoah was the
earthly counterpart of the sun god.
IN
THE BEGINNING
“In
the beginning, Egyptian legends attested,
floodwaters
engulfed the world.
Nothing stirred amid the dark and dismal
expanse,
Then, miraculously, a
lotus blossom surfaced
And opened its petals to give birth to sun.
Rising from the blossom like a golden bird,
The sun subdued the waters and
Coaxed life from the emerging land.
Even after, when the Nile receded and the
growing season began,
People gave thanks to the sun god…
And to his earthly counterpart, the Pharaoh,
Who claimed divine powers and kept the country
fruitful.”
Sermon –
“Akhenaten, Radical Pharoah:
News From the Tomb?”
This sermon is, in some
sense a corollary to the sermon series on “The Challenge of Religious
Pluralism: The Big Answers.”
So far in the series, we
have considered Big Answers provided by two religions, Judaism
and Islam. Judaism bases itself in a Covenant made with their ONE God,
Yahweh, and it was in that relationship that all meaning and purpose
for adherents’ lives took shape. Adherents to Islam found an answer
and purpose to their lives in submission; submission to their one God,
Allah. And, we considered how those two ideas – Living in
Covenant, and Submission to a Higher Power – could translate
themselves into wisdom for our own Unitarian Universalist spiritual
and religious journeys.
John Bohman, a long-time
member of our church, sent an e-mail to Michael and me, suggesting that
we not leave Confucianism out of our sermon series, as we did.
John let us know that,
in terms of numbers, Confucianism is probably #2 after Christianity
and is basic to the East Asian cultures of China, Japan, and Korea.
He wrote, “Confucius supplied an answer in China to extremely turbulent
times by creating a whole way of social cohesion, a collective orientation,
a grounding in tradition, and a sense of loyalty.” Although socially
conservative, John thinks that we have much to learn from East Asia,
beyond Buddhism, Taoism, and Shintoism. He ends his note by saying this:
“In short, I am suggesting a sermon topic for one of you some time before
summer.” Who knows, one of us might indeed take him up on that challenge!
You’ll have to stay tuned to find out!
I’m so delighted to get
lots of feedback from the congregation about how this particular series
on religious pluralism is stimulating your thinking. I’m sure that our
participation will take us along a variety of marvelous paths that will
not only deepen our understanding of other faiths, but enrich our own
in countless, unpredictable ways.
Well, I’ve been down a
marvelous path, myself.
It’s one that leads back
in time to Ancient Egypt.
Now, why should that be?
Is there any real news from the Tomb? My guess is that, “Yes,” there
certainly is. The more we put the archaeological pieces together from
discoveries into our distant past, the better we will understand the
fantastic web of the human story. We hear, as best we can through the
density of days between us, the stories of our Ancestors.
Ancestors, in many religions,
are honored for the links they establish between the generations.
We are not created out
of whole cloth in the middle of Now. The threads have been spinning
for quite a long, long time, and the incredible tapestry of humanity
is far from being finished.
May we avoid being too
self-important in assessing our uniqueness, or self-indulgent in dramatizing
our solitude in space and time.
What we can learn of long-gone
cultures is fascinating. As a child I remember loving the great articles
and photos and maps in the National Geographic Magazines; particularly
those about Ancient Egypt. Archaeological digs and discoveries, illustrations
of pyramids and tombs, hieroglyphics, stelae’s and statuary. I’ve always
found the art and design of ancient Egypt to be quite beautiful. Beliefs
surrounding death and the art and artifacts in the tomb pull at my imagination
and wonder; to say nothing of the concept and building of the amazing
pyramids.
Successions of Pharoahs
and their Queens, over thousands of years and Dynasties, and through
Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms, looked much alike in their depictions.
Then, recently, I became aware of one Pharoah who seemed quite different
from those before him and those who came after.
He was called the “Heretic
Pharoah,” and caused a short-lived, but significant cultural and religious
revolution. And, the whole story isn’t known. What is known has inspired
different interpretations. The puzzle—the mystery—remains.
He was born, Amenhotep
IV, the second son of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiy, who was a descendant
of a Hebrew tribe. Because his older brother died prematurely, he became
the tenth king of the 18th Dynasty. He also became, perhaps,
the most controversial king because of his break with traditional religion.
Some say he was the most remarkable to sit on Egypt’s throne. He reigned
about 3,500 years ago and became the cause of one of the greatest religious
and social revolutions that ever convulsed Egypt. He was far more of
a thinker and philosopher than his forebears.
Amenhotep IV, the child,
never appeared in any portraits and wasn’t taken to public events. He
received no honors. He was ignored or rejected by others, but the reason
for that is unknown. He was, however, favored by his mother, a powerful
woman in her own right.
In 1352 BCE, he ascended
to the throne, succeeding his father who had died. He was just a teenager,
but it was the desire of Queen Tiy that he rule.
The beginning of
this Pharoah’s reign marked no great discontinuity with that of his
predecessors. He was crowned at Karnak, the temple of the god Amun,
and, like his father, he married a woman of non-royal blood, the beautiful
Nefertiti.
There was another God,
besides Amun, that Amenhotep IV revered, and it was the Aten, who was
worshipped in earlier times. He introduced a new monotheistic cult of
the Aten, believing that this God was literally embodied within the
sun; in the solar disc.
Early in his reign, he
changed his name to Akhenaten, meaning, “He Who is of Service to Aten,
and, one day he had a vision wherein he saw a sun disc between two mountains.
He felt that God was guiding him to make a change; to build a city between
two mountains.
In the sixth year of his
reign, Akhenaten rejected the Gods of Thebes. They were never part of
his childhood anyway since he had been shunned as a child. To make a
complete break, the king and his queen left Thebes behind and moved
to a new capital in Middle Egypt, half way between Memphis and Thebes.
It was a virgin site, not previously dedicated to any other god or goddess,
and he named the site of his new city, Akhetaten – The Horizon of Aten.
It was 1342 BC. The city
grew to about 20,000 people and is on a site that is known now as Tell
el-amarna.
Palaces and buildings were
quickly made of mud brick, and he built a temple to Aten filled with
religious art. It also contained many altars for placing offerings of
fruits, flowers, garden produce, and burning incense, but there were
no blood sacrifices of any kind. Hymns sung to Aten were accompanied
by musical instruments. The worship was joyous in character and the
surrounding were bright and cheerful. This was not the traditional worship
in Egyptian temples.
In the new religion that
Akhenaten developed, the god, Aten, was regarded as the giver of life,
and the source of all life on this earth. His symbols were the heat
and light of the sun that vivified and nourished all creation. The creed
of Aten ascribed a monotheistic character or oneness, and denied the
existence of any other god.
The views held by the King
and his followers were that Aten had existed forever; he had created
the sun and its path, and heaven and earth and every living being. Everything
came from Aten and everything depended on him; he was everlasting.
In ancient Egypt, the Pharoahs
were thought to be able to speak to the Gods and convey the Gods’ wishes
to their subjects. Akhenaten took this a step further, believing himself
to be a part of Aten; himself imbued with divinity, with some essence
of Aten, rather than a royal go-between. As such, he was bold in his
creativity.
Akhenaten encouraged a
whole new style in art to celebrate Aten, and it is during his reign
that the Egyptian artists first included shading in their work.
Mural decorations were
different from those of the other Egyptian temples; they were less severe,
less conventional, and they were painted in lively colors.
The visible emblem of the
one god was depicted everywhere -- as the solar disc, with rays emanating
from it. Each ray had a small hand at its end, holding ankhs,
the hieroglyph for life. The Royal family was always represented with
the sun-disc above them, and the rays of the sun reaching down to them.
There
were no other gods depicted anywhere, and the usual images of the Pharoah
were changed by Akhenaten as well. The Pharoahs always had idealized,
strong muscular bodies. Akhenaten did not want to be identified as a
warrior king.
The style for physical
characteristics that Akhenaten developed was quite a departure; heads,
faces, fingers and toes were elongated. Lips were full and hips were
wide.
The artists were encouraged
to show scenes of the real life of the Pharoah – many with his daughters
and Nefertiti, showing affection to each other – something that was
never done before.
In the twelfth year of
Akhenaten’s reign, Nefertiti, who had shared power with her husband
as a priest and leader, was gone. It is assumed she died, perhaps in
childbirth, but nothing is known for sure.
In another 4 years, Akhenaten
died of unknown causes. There is evidence that a burial chamber had
been prepared for the king, but all that was found were heavily smashed
fragments of his sarcophagus and other items.
His death initiated a return
to orthodoxy and a backlash of destruction. Those that thought of him
as a heretic, rushed in to destroy everything Akhenaten had created.
Heads of Akhenaten and
Nefertiti were broken off statues, their faces scraped off pictures
and monuments, their names scratched out of anything the destroyers
could find. The buildings were sacked, and blocks from the Aten temples
were used as rubble infill for later construction.
What was left of Amarna
was lost in antiquity until the end of the 19th century.
Over 3,000 years ago, the
rebel Pharoah, Akhenaten, preached monotheism and enraged the Nile Valley.
Less than 100 years after Akhenaten’s death, Moses would be preaching
monotheism, on the banks of the Nile River, to the Hebrews. Some Egyptologists
believe it is possible that there is a connection between the monotheism
of Akhenaten and Moses.
The idea of a single
god, once the radical belief of an isolated heretic, is now embraced
by Jews, Christians, and Muslims throughout the world.
It is extremely difficult
to look back at really old civilizations and be able to truly understand
their thoughts and ideas, their world-view. What we know now, what we’ve
experienced as a collective unconscious, and the discoveries and science
and art and technologies that are by now in our blood and bones, render
it impossible to ever know fully our ancestor’s minds. We know the human
things we have in common, and we can understand the threads of their
legacy woven into the dynamism of change. But, we cannot know the nuances
of their daily ideas, thoughts, and relationships, no matter how advanced
their society, because so much has been lost through the great stretches
of time.
That said, and I feel the
loss as great sadness, --what instructs me from the shadows of that
ancient empty and desecrated tomb of a man who became the servant of
the Sun, part visionary, part divine, is to cherish every ounce of innovation,
creativity, and risk inside me. It is dangerous and it is glorious.
It is best applied with profound love for life than with raw and stubborn
power, but it is precious nevertheless.
We cannot leave much behind
us. But if we’ve had the courage to create something new, something
revolutionary, something unheard of, then we should be comforted that
at some future time, an explorer will brush the sand off our crumbled
painted temples, and gently collect the shards of containers we held
dear, and be able to touch our memory with great care and communion.
Do you think you can’t
possibly create something new, revolutionary, and unheard of? Well,
think again! Akhenaten lives!
Benediction
We have walked through
many lives,
Some of them our own,
And we are not who we were,
Though some principle of
being
Abides…
We are not done with our
changes.
--Stanley Kunitz (adapted)
Let us walk softly, friends
For strange paths lie before
us
All untrod.
--Lillian Gray
Amen, Shalom, and Blessed Be!