Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington, VA
A diverse, welcoming community of open hearts and minds since 1948
Annually we review the process we use to provide funds from the Sunday offering to support initiatives and non-profit organizations within and outside the church. This year we have appointed a short term Task Force to review the process, since the Social Action Council was disbanded in this summer. The Task Force members Ann Marie Hay, Rhonda Buckner, Mark deFrancis and Gene Mulligan have begun a review of our Share-the-Plate procedures and outcomes to present recommendations to Rev. Carlton then to the Professional Team in early April. Following is a notice from the Task Force:
Meetings of the Task Force with interested members and friends are set for Sunday, March 6 after the second service in Room 9, Monday, March 7 at 7:30 in the Volunteer Room, and Sunday, March 13 after the first service in the Volunteer Room - as part of the Second Sunday Social Justice Conversation Drop-In. The Task Force will brief attendees on current practices and seek comments from attendees including responses to the following:
--What do you think has worked well with the Share-the-Plate process? What do you see as less successful, as a time waster, or otherwise less effective?
--How do you think UUCA should prioritize beneficiaries as to type of service, e.g., advocacy/direct service; local/national/international?
--Are there particular topic areas that you recommend should be "locked in" for inclusion, e.g., immigration, emergency food and shelter, human rights, civil rights?
--Do you think Share-the-Plate requests should be preceded by a briefing by a beneficiary representative?
--How many Share-the-Plate requests would you welcome during the church year?
The Task Force would especially appreciate input from congregants who have experience with previous Share-the-Plate services and ideas about how it might operate in the future. Written comments are also encouraged and may be sent to rhondabuckner@comcast.net for use by the Task Force.
Tags:
With respect to the Guatemala project:
1) before STP, PAG had a good feel for who supported the project financially. With cash donations to the plate, we lost much of that information. Knowing who are the active, committed supporters is fundamental to the growth of the project, to modifying it, etc.
2) STP is only second-class financial support from UUCA as an institution. It is not a firm financial commitment; is 'soft' money. The money raised depends on who hears the presentation on the STP Sunday, the weather, support from the pulpit, the number of active supporters who attend that Sunday, numbers of checkbooks in the pews vs. purses/wallets with a little cash, etc. And, again, if PAG does not know who has contributed, conducting a fund drive to raise what is needed to support accompaniment is made more difficult; which supporters would still need to be contacted?.
For any on-going project of the church, the percentage to be raised by STP should not be more than 50%. The other 50% should be in the annual operating budget.
John Sutton
Started by Lavona Grow. Last reply by Rev. Linda Olson Peebles Mar 9.
Started by Todd Parola. Last reply by June Herold Jan 18.
Posted by UUCAVA on May 26, 2012 at 1:38pm
Posted by Rev. Michael McGee on May 23, 2012 at 3:46pm — 1 Comment
Posted by Natalia Averett on May 7, 2012 at 11:30pm
Posted by UUCAVA on May 22, 2012 at 2:25pm
Posted by Rev. Michael McGee on May 21, 2012 at 3:00pm
Posted by Rev. Linda Olson Peebles on May 20, 2012 at 6:00pm — 2 Comments
Posted by Rev. Linda Olson Peebles on May 20, 2012 at 6:31pm
Posted by Rev. Linda Olson Peebles on May 20, 2012 at 6:47pm — 2 Comments
Posted by UUCAVA on May 17, 2012 at 9:45am
Posted by Jacomina de Regt on May 7, 2012 at 3:43pm
Getting Started Activities
© 2012 Created by UUCAVA.