Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington, VA

A diverse, welcoming community of open hearts and minds since 1948

Welcome to a discussion about amendments to the UUCA Constitution that were proposed by the Constitution Task Force, then modified and approved by the Board of Trustees for consideration by the congregation at a special meeting March 21. 

 

The Board created the task force in August, and appointed Juliet Purll (Chair), Henry Ernstthal, John Gunning, Barbara Hynak, Peter Overby and Tom O'Reilly (ex officio) as members.  We since have been researching and drafting those proposed changes. Our work goes hand-in-hand with another proposal:  to incorporate UUCA under Virginia law. The board is asking the congregation to consider the proposals at a special congregational meeting March 21.

 

Please read the brief description of the proposal below, then click on the links for a more thorough discussion.

 

- Current and Proposed Constitutions Compared  - a side-by-side comparison of the current and proposed constitutions, with the changes annotated

- Why Should UUCA Incorporate?

- Revising UUCA's Constitution: The Quick Read-  a summary of the proposed changes and the process.

 

We hope this material will help you understand what’s proposed and why.

 

We need your feedback.  Please make a comment on this page, visit us (the Constitution Task Force and Trustees) at our Table in the Fellowship Hall after Sunday services, and/or join a discussion in the Board Room after services on March 14.

 

-----------------

Here, in brief, is what’s going on:

 

Two Broad Goals

First, the congregation is asked, Should UUCA incorporate? Virginia only recently allowed churches to do this. So, for example, legal liability falls on UUCA trustees individually, not on the church itself. The board believes incorporation would help the business side of the church, with no effect on the faith side.

 

Second, the congregation is asked to adopt the proposed constitutional revisions, updating some provisions that are outmoded or ineffective, and eliminating others that are obsolete or no longer mesh with our governance system. We believe the revisions will streamline governing procedures, make the process more transparent and increase accountability.

 

(If the congregation adopts the revisions March 21, a handful of technical constitutional revisions would come before the annual meeting June 13. We believe they are non-controversial.)

 

Two Big Changes

1. The congregation would not amend the annual budget, but would still vote it up or down. The staff would be required to hold open hearings as it prepared the budget. Finally, if spending during the year went 5 percent over budget, the board would be required to notify the congregation, but the congregation would no longer vote on approving the additional spending.

 

2. Trustee terms would be two years, not three, a change intended to make the board more accountable for budgetary and other decisions. Trustees could seek re-election and serve up to six consecutive years, a change that we believe will improve effectiveness and reduce burnout among trustees.

 

Other Noteworthy Changes

            - Minimum membership age of 14, not 16

            - New transparency language

            - Two-year terms, not one year, for Nominating Committee members

            - More e-mail, less snail mail, for communications with UUCA members

            - Deletion of a redundant article describing UUCA’s organization, and an outmoded article on hiring Religious Education directors.

 

Finally, we edited the constitution for clarity and consistency.  We hope you find that the proposed revisions make it easier to read and understand.

 

Please let us know what you think about our proposal.

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I agree with Diane Ullius that we are together in covenant and congregation. I believe that to fulfill that covenant, we must be engaged members. This requires consistent practice. Practice consists of paying attention to one another and to fulfilling our stated vision and mission throughout the church year.

By the time the annual budget is presented for vote at the annual meeting, engaged members have addressed their dreams, concerns, and questions to church leaders who as practicing engaged members themselves, know not only how to listen, but also how to address differences of view, and support a budget that reflects engaged members' priorities and choices; a budget that also reflects and is supported by responsible stewardship.

There are multiple opportunities before the Annual Meeting for every engaged member to be heard and for every engaged leader to listen and respond. The budget presented at the Annual Meeting needs to be the budget that engaged members helped create. The Annual Meeting is a time for affirmation of the hard work practicing, engaged members, including leaders, do all year long.

Sarah Munson

Reply to This

The annual meeting is the wrong place to make line-item spending decisions for all the reasons noted below--a few hours, limited patience, few members, limited forethought given the usually surprise nature of the amendments. The work leading up to the creation of the budget is the true demonstration of the democratic process and bottom-up decisionmaking. The annual meeting is not designed for detailed governance. Our staff and trustees exist to represent and hear and then act. Doing more than ratifying the budget at the annual meeting is a travesty of our governance structure and process. Amending the budget in the annual meeting may sometimes look like fun or feel rebellious or feel like it is our best chance to act out the democratic process, but it is inevitably over trivialities that waste time and patience or over weighty matters that should never be decided by such a process--they were thrashed out previously and would continue to be thrashed out in the more appropriate venues of debate during the ensuing year. The proposal to eliminate budget amendments at the annual meeting, if passed, will allow time for more celebretory and community building activities to be invented for that event and actually attract more people to it. And passage of the amendment will properly focus everyone's attention on participating in the budget making process.

Reply to This

Blog Posts

Cynthia Adcock

Being PK But Not PC?

Posted by Cynthia Adcock on July 29, 2010 at 12:00am — 1 Comment

Rev. Michael McGee

Dear Abby

Posted by Rev. Michael McGee on July 28, 2010 at 8:49pm

Rev. Michael McGee

A Renewed 10 Commandments

Posted by Rev. Michael McGee on July 29, 2010 at 8:29am — 1 Comment

Madelyn Campbell

Wear Your Papers

Posted by Madelyn Campbell on July 27, 2010 at 1:22pm — 2 Comments

Natalia Averett

From the Board Chair-Talking About Talking

Posted by Natalia Averett on July 27, 2010 at 4:00pm

Laura Dely

Sign-up for Look Cool for School Now

Posted by Laura Dely on July 27, 2010 at 3:46pm

Robert Buckman

V.O.I.C.E. 2010-2011 Organizing Priorities

Posted by Robert Buckman on July 2, 2010 at 1:30pm — 3 Comments

Rev. Mary McKinnon Ganz

Packing my bags

Posted by Rev. Mary McKinnon Ganz on May 30, 2010 at 6:46pm

Rev. Michael McGee

Sermon Theme next year?

Posted by Rev. Michael McGee on May 13, 2010 at 5:37pm — 11 Comments

Photos

Loading…

Help & Getting Started

Getting Started Activities

For members, friends and inquiring friends: Please, pick up your keys, or Sign In credentials, on Sundays after each service or contact Sarah Masters, for them.

Please also read the following:

Online Community and ministry: A blog

The Getting Started blog

For Parents & Families

• Our Congregational Covenant: We embrace a diversity of opinions, viewpoints, and beliefs. By participating here, you agree to uphold our covenant. Continue reading


HELP

• Ask the Website Admin Questions and request help.

• Help Each Other: Post Questions to a Discussion Board


© 2010   UUCA, the Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington, VA

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!