At our annual meeting on June 14, I requested consideration by the congregation of a name change. I am not sure how the process will unfold (by task force? by holding meetings? by web site discussions?). Anyway, let me get started here with my basic thoughts: (1) our current name is more of a denominational descriptor instead of an identity; (2) our current name is not uniformly used. The fact is that our church name is 16 syllables long, and is rarely used. We often use an acronym, UUCA, which, to me, is very off-putting.
Of course, this leads to the question, what name should we consider? I have my own ideas, but let me start with some food for thought. It seems that we use a church name in three different contexts....(1) between and among our church community; (2) when talking to people outside of our congregation in the Northern Virginia/Metro DC community; and (3) when talking to other UU's. So, in considering a name, think about how it would be used in those three contexts. (1) first context...assume a minister is giving a sermon, and says, "Here at_______(fill in your suggested name...right now we often would say "Here at UUCA"). (2) second context....assume you are talking to a neighbor, and in response to their question about where you go to church, you say "I go to_____(fill in your suggested name...right now we say a hodge-podge of names. (3) third context....assume you are talking to someone from Tulsa at the General Assembly....in response to the question, which church do you represent, you say "I am from______(fill in your suggested name....right now, we might say "UUCA", or...what?). And then, in trying to come up with a name, figure out how it might look on a new, large facing Route 50. How will it look to the drivers on Rt. 50? How will other churches in the VOICE movement refer to us?
Let me know your thoughts, whether on this website, or in person, or by separate e-mail. All I ask is, keep an open mind! Bill Fogarty